The Iraq War Was Wrong Blog

The world has many wrongs, and many wars, but there's only one wrong Iraq war.

"A wrong war like during the Iraq war was cannot just be sitted idly by by." --The Proprietor

Saturday, April 16, 2005

For the last time

Oh boy the email's just keep coming. How many times do I have to explain: I am not Glenn Reynolds. Glenn Reynolds is a dhinger. I can explain this six ways from Sunday but thats the long and the short of it. Do i have to draw you a picture>


Why aren't you guys bothering HIM about this. What does HE tell you when you ask him. Or is he being coy? (If so that would explain ALOT).


You know,(either way) it really would behouve Glenn Reynolds to make a post on his "so" called Instaputzi blog to clear this up and once and for all that he is not me and vise verca. Because this misunderstanding is RELLY causing me inconvenience and he has to share in his share of the responsibility for it.(if you ask me). But I guess evoiding responsibility it's is just a part & parcel of being a Straussian.

UPDATE: Welcome Instaputzi readers although I don't know why I bother with a bunch of dhingers like u. Seem's like Glenn is still being coy is he not(refuse to answer Yes or not from what I glean of his post). Tipical. Anyway since your all a bunch of dhingers who supported the war (The Iraq War) I guess that peace loving gesture's like this and this would be just lost on you. Ok whatever just go back to leafing thru yr Strauss or whatever.

UPDATE 2: Well how do u like this NOW people are starting to doubt whether there was Glenn Instaputzi confusion in the first place. "It's was a trick" bla bla bla they are saying(so lame reponse/it's just shows u have no arguments of substance). Well read it and weep buckers the impression was out there making it incumbent upon GLENN (not me) to clear it up. So your wrong admit it(must be painful huh).

62 Comments:

At 4/17/2005 8:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

But if Instaputzi denys hes you hes probably lying because hes a dhinger.

So mabey it would be betre if glen renolds sais he really is iww then we would know he isnt rellay.

Anomnymnous (not gLen reynols)

 
At 4/17/2005 10:38 AM, Blogger iraqwarwrong said...

Well the sad part is that as long as Glenn Reynolds maintains this deafining silence on the issue. He can leave it hanging over my head. The ball's in his court question is will he take it? Or just(irresponabile) let the misuhnderstanding fester.

 
At 4/25/2005 10:51 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Err . . . whatever. Too bad. And, got any sure-fire way to bring down someone like Saddam Hussein or Hitler without firing a shot?

 
At 4/25/2005 10:51 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is bad spelling required on this blog?

 
At 4/25/2005 11:04 AM, Blogger iraqwarwrong said...

Anon@1051 did u ever think of NOT approaching Saddam hussein with attitude to "bring him down" but more collaberative/open attitude? Gee guess not Why is war always the first resort for you dhingers?

 
At 4/25/2005 11:11 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am pritty sher that Renold's site is an ironic front for some some liberal super genius like RObert Scheer or Judy Woodruff. I mean, look at it. It just can't be for real. Nobody reely thinks that wayt! I hava a good LOL ever time I reed it.

 
At 4/25/2005 11:12 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

For the love of God, learn some fuckin' English, you goddamned moron.

 
At 4/25/2005 11:14 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't think anyone needs to say anything. Instapundit is written in English and yours appears to be written in gibberish.

Blogger does have a spellcheck, you know.

 
At 4/25/2005 11:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

K, U rool.
I don think U kno wat U R talking about.
cAuse, like, you know, like. the UN and stuff asked him reeel nice to stop B'ing a KnasTy kllller and stuf?
bUt he was to l337 of a mass mrrrrderrrrerrrr to do dat.

so like SmmmBdy had to go and, like, stop him and stuf.

 
At 4/25/2005 11:17 AM, Blogger iraqwarwrong said...

OMG I can't freaking BELIEVE u people are so behind the time's as to harp on my "so" called bad spelling/grammer/ect AS IF THAT PROVES ANYTHING. It just shows u have no REAL argument's to speak of but frankly I don't have time/werewithal to go over this again like remedial class for a bunch of slow learner's, I covered it all here so go inlighten yourself's u dhingers!!1 (ROFFTLFLOL u guy's just prove yourselves so lame its cracking me up)

 
At 4/25/2005 11:33 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is a werewithal anything a werewolf? Or did you mean wherewithal?
Actually, I think English is a second language for this bozo.

 
At 4/25/2005 11:34 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

lololololololololololol

you GOT to be kidding. No one could be this stewpud.

 
At 4/25/2005 11:35 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is a werewithal anything like a werewolf? Or did you mean wherewithal?
Actually, I think English is a second language for this bozo.

 
At 4/25/2005 11:44 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

OMG, yuose guyz got r0xx0r3d!!!@!!!1111one LOL

 
At 4/25/2005 11:44 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This site rivals protein wisdom as one of the funniest blogs around. Absolutely hilarious.

 
At 4/25/2005 11:47 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Please don't tell me I have to read more of this thing to tell me what a dhinger is.

 
At 4/25/2005 11:49 AM, Blogger Alec Rawls said...

Wait a minute. This HAS to be a spoof site created by the REAL Glenn Reynolds. Look at the "iraqwarwrong" comments. They are hilarious! Nobody could do that by mistake. Glenn!!

 
At 4/25/2005 11:52 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Come on Glen, admit it. This is your lame attempt to horn in on Scrappleface.com.

 
At 4/25/2005 11:53 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I folowed yur link to you're defense's of your mispelling's, but it won't wash. You don't know the differense between plural's and possessive's. That's just ignorance, not "typoes." Don't worry; no one would mistake you for the Yale-educated Glen Raynold's--Reely, reelay, realy!!!

 
At 4/25/2005 11:59 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I thot for a minite that this might have been a Renolds (sic) spoof too. But look how much werk has gone into it. Look at the kristol clear thinking! No, it is instaputze that is the spoof.

 
At 4/25/2005 12:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

wut if u supported saddam slaughtering his peeple instead of the insurgeons? duz that make me a peas loving dhingus?

curious...

 
At 4/25/2005 12:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dhinger is like Cockney rhyming slang, dinger for right-winger, or else short for right wing dinger. viz http://iraqwarwrong.blogspot.com/2004/07/whether-to-feel-safer.html I can't explain the 'h' though.

It is a funny post too. I especially liked the malapropism of "high stepper" for "goose stepper".

The guy writing this stuff is either an idiot or a genius. I don't think he can be both.

 
At 4/25/2005 12:18 PM, Blogger iraqwarwrong said...

Dudes you guys I explained all about dhinger here. Try to keep up Do I have 2 hold ur hand's? Use the RHS right hand sidebar links(an invaluable resources).

 
At 4/25/2005 12:30 PM, Blogger AatomSmith said...

Goodness. Why Reynolds would want to link to this kind of illiterate rambling is beyond me. But if your purpose in maintaining the delusional fantasy that anyone could possibly confuse this incoherent anti-war boilerplate for his erudite commentary was to get linked by him, then bravo!

Mission accomplished.

 
At 4/25/2005 12:36 PM, Blogger iraqwarwrong said...

Dude you can scawf all you want but the impression was out there whether u want to believe it or not. So your wrong and cant admit it. How do you like that, dhinger?

 
At 4/25/2005 12:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This has to be a fake site put up by a conservative to make liberals look bad.

There's no way that someone is going to be so ignorant as to start a blog and post defending their positions, while simultaneously spelling so atrociously to ensure no one past a 6th grade education would ever take that person's stances seriously.

 
At 4/25/2005 12:45 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So 'dhinger' is supposed to rhyme with 'whinger'? So much for the rhyming slang theory. Here is a clue for you: whinge rhymes with singe. Whinger rhymes niether with winger or finger.

 
At 4/25/2005 12:47 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shit. I thought I was Glenn.

Not Frank J. (Really.)

 
At 4/25/2005 12:48 PM, Blogger iraqwarwrong said...

You might be mistaken me for a Brit who would use that type of acceunt to say word's. Anyway whatever its a stupidass word anyway/i just used it for lexico genesis. If you got a problem w/that u know where u can it . I dont get u people with all this nitt pickintg dont you have anything of substance to say. GEE guess not that just show's how wrong the Iraq war was afterall.

 
At 4/25/2005 12:49 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

i agree with iraqwarwaswrong. the iraqis don't deserve the oppotunity at freedom and should have stayed under saddams oppression

 
At 4/25/2005 1:13 PM, Anonymous Keith said...

"Welcome Instaputzi readers although I don't know why I bother with a bunch of dhingers like u."

-- And people like this think they are the authority on what wars are wrong.

 
At 4/25/2005 1:35 PM, Blogger iraqwarwrong said...

No I'm not the authority just hte messager.

 
At 4/25/2005 1:44 PM, Blogger Electronic Bubba said...

hay feller, when they done 'at bypass they hooked yore gut up to yore haid, cause you shore got shit fer brains!

 
At 4/25/2005 1:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah, this just has to be a spoof. There's no way this could be real, unless there's some correlation between illiteracy and arrogance...

 
At 4/25/2005 2:21 PM, Blogger Bill Rudersdorf said...

Excellent ESL satire (you can't make this stuff up!).

 
At 4/25/2005 2:33 PM, Blogger AatomSmith said...

Alright, I guess I get the joke now. Seems like a huge amount of effort just to satirize a political position. Whoever puts this thing together (Glenn certainly wouldn't have this much time to waste, even if he were so inclined) might want to consider getting a life.

 
At 4/25/2005 2:53 PM, Anonymous anomdebus said...

Ok, so Stuart Buck posts an arguably facetious post linking the two sites together, and you are taking it to be a hard statement of belief?

One theory would say that is because this site is a farce, another would be that you have no sense of perspective.

I would say Reynolds have no stake in either confirming or denying any sort of connection, and so he might as well have fun with it. That is his intention with his site anyway. At least, he wouldn't be doing it if it wasn't fun.

 
At 4/25/2005 2:58 PM, Blogger iraqwarwrong said...

anomebus LOLLL look at how u twist urself into pretzel's here when the truth is simple plain as day. Long story short- there was a confusion in the blogasphere (Buck post = EVIDENCE do u neocon's even know what REAL evidence looks like anymore guess not?) and a ground swell of pressure built for Glenn to clear it up. Which he could no longer ignore!! So Glenn made his post. Which is STILL somewhat coy. But nevertheless is sweet vindacation.

You try to explain all that away with ur sophistries well you can't. not by a long shot. YOU LOSE DHINGER

ADvantage: iraqwarwrong

 
At 4/25/2005 3:18 PM, Blogger PJ Bottoms said...

Thats relly telling them, IWW. Glad to sea your back. By the weigh, refurring to you by your ininitals razes the quetsion, due you identify with the Wobblies?

 
At 4/25/2005 3:21 PM, Anonymous anomdebus said...

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA..
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHA
eh... [ahem] hehe ...
AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA..
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA..
HhahahaHAHAHAHAhAHahahahahAHAH..
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

at least I assume you were talking to me. :)
..groundswell ... heheha

 
At 4/25/2005 3:35 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This site is either a spoof by a conservative, in which case, good job, keep it up. Or, it's done by some fifteen year old kid who really should be doing their homework.
If it is neither, then your comments about pretty much everything on this site are in fact self incriminating of your own ignorance to the Iraqi conflict. My advice: Get off of your lazy butt and go do something productive for your country instead of being the critic who doesn't count.

 
At 4/25/2005 3:50 PM, Anonymous anomdebus said...

BTW, I apologize for the bandwidth wasted taking ...er .. myself too seriously.

 
At 4/25/2005 3:51 PM, Anonymous Not Glenn either said...

Heh indeed.

 
At 4/25/2005 3:52 PM, Blogger iraqwarwrong said...

Apology accepted(graciously). It take's a big man to admit when that he's wrong about that a war was right and instead of wrong which it was. Coridally,

 
At 4/25/2005 3:57 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Iraqwarwaswrong writes: "Anon@1051 did u ever think of NOT approaching Saddam hussein[sic] with attitude to "bring him down" but more collaberative[sic]/open attitude? Gee guess not [sic] Why is war always the first resort for you dhingers?"

The futility of arguing with you is exceeded only by your unwillingness to listen to reason and your inability to discern what the facts are/were. SH was given NUMEROUS options other than war, his response was pomposity, the firing of guns/rifles from his balcony and slaughter of 10's of thousands. It's not that you are anti war; it's that you are plainly anti-intellectual.

By the bye, I'm a terrible speller, but I take the time to check mine... why don't you try the same?

GMRoper

 
At 4/25/2005 4:06 PM, Blogger iraqwarwrong said...

Uh yeah GMRoper weell you talk and talk and talk (many words/many lies)but you know whats funny is from what I skim of you're comment one little thing which didn't appaer in your comment amongst all those words- that's right GEE I WONDER WHY I see no mention of a little thing call "W. M. D.'s". Remembe those? OH SORRY is that a sore sobject or waht.

As foir shooting rifle, What you NRA type's now for gun control?/

As for 10s of thousand's (of his people) kill ever heard of Sunk costs? Try take an Economic's course FOR A CHANGE.

Man u guy's are too much. I think the psycological term is Denial. ROFYL

 
At 4/25/2005 4:28 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

How intellectually dishonest are you? Your hatred for Bush has completely blinded your judgement. Do you really believe people think Mr. Reynolds also writes this blog, or are you just that ignorant? It is completely obvious after reading your horrible grammar, and atrocious spelling, that your writing is somwhere near the 3rd grade level, while Mr. Reynolds is extremely well versed in the English language. However, if this is a joke (I will refrain from using parity, so you wont confuse it with parody), along with all your illogical anti-war posts, you sir, are a genius.

 
At 4/25/2005 4:38 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sunk Costs eh? How about the people in his prisons that were going to be killed by Hussein? Or the people that would be imprisoned and killed in the future. Surely you can't call them sunk costs. Or was it their destiny?
But, if you want to play the sunk cost game, then previous casulties don't matter, and since the Iraqi people are happier, the Iraq War Was Right.
However, it does not work that way, and all non-terrorist deaths are factors of production for freedom, in a sense. God bless all of those serving in the military protecting America, so that we can enjoy the freedoms of daily life that hopefully the Iraqis will be able to experience in the near future.

 
At 4/25/2005 4:41 PM, Blogger iraqwarwrong said...

AH so AT LAST the truth come's out its all about your "God" is it (I knew it). Theocracy wear's a disguise but it always revells itself at the end.

Take your crusading nonsense elsewhere dhinger this is a Reality based weblog.

 
At 4/25/2005 4:49 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Do you understand the intricacies of the english language, or are you trying to avoid the point of my post? I said God Bless the soldiers, meaning I wish them the best possible luck. I am not religious at all, so my crusading is only in your mind. Care to respond to the post, and not three words having nothing to do with the point? It seems fairly hypocritical of you to call out others for mocking your horrible spelling, instead of the point of your post, no?

 
At 4/25/2005 4:51 PM, Blogger iraqwarwrong said...

LOL look at you spinning and twirling. u probably forgot what ur point was huh? From what I skimmed of you're comment THERE IS NONE thats the point. I guess that's what happens when u support a wrong war.

 
At 4/25/2005 4:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe you should learn some new words to skim besides you, and, are, and his. You might actually learn how to construct a proper English sentence. I was taking issue with your reference to the people Saddam Hussein killed in his torture chambers as "sunk costs". Are we clear on the point of my post?

 
At 4/25/2005 5:00 PM, Blogger iraqwarwrong said...

how can u take issue with sunk cost's? This is well establish economic's concept Maybe you just ignorant of basic facts(don't worry I don't blame you) but I don't have time/energy to waste time schooling you on basic concepts. check out this post on sunk costs and if u still confused get back to me,

Coridally,

 
At 4/25/2005 5:11 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is like speaking to a brick wall. Did you actually read my whole post or are 10 sentences too much for you to comprehend? If Saddam Hussein is still in power, people are still being killed in his torture chambers. Therefore future costs cannot already be sunk, because they can be avoided. Following your logic anyone who dies is a sunk cost, even though there are emotional and financial costs still incurred by others. Are you willing to say that if less people die per year under the new Iraqi regime than would have under Saddam, this war is right? If not why are you using the sunk cost analogy?

 
At 4/25/2005 5:18 PM, Blogger iraqwarwrong said...

Dude whatare you talking about First of all when people was in Saddam's "so" call torture chambers on day of So-called "decapitation strike" they were still ALIVE not dead otherwise they would be dead(in the ground). So I mean LOL thats obviosuly not who I'm talking about as a sunk cost in the first . They was alive. get it? (do u know the differents between already killed and not already killed or waht/ How basic do I have 2 make this)

Second so what are u saying That we invaded a country to break like a few hundred (AT MOST) people's out of some jails in some foreign Arab country? Um LOL then were gonna have to invade like Egypt Saudi Pakistan ect. OR IS THAT YOUR PLAN LIKE YOUR MASTER STRAUSS INSTRAUCT's? Anyway that CERTAINLY not the rationale's given to Congress or doesn't that matter2 yoiu? (Answer - course not)

SECOND how can you speak of less people die. Ever hear of a little thing call a ``STUDY`` which showed that 100,000 thousand EXTRA people died overtop of normal Saddam death rate BECAUSE OF U.S. ACTION!!!

"Liberation democracy" ya right liberation to death is more like it. But you go ahead prattle about torture chambers bla bla Meanwhile did u notice they have a hard time forming a government by the deadline and the eelectircity is not back up to snuff Hmmm? But NOOO u R totally silent on that issues

(you probably thought I wouldn't notice that huh- thought wrong Buddy).

 
At 4/25/2005 5:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow, I am not going to argue with people who get their facts from Daily KOS in the future.
I thought my posts were fairly clear, but apparently not, so I will try a different method. Those 100,000 civilians that you claim were killed(im not going to get into that BS figure with you), are sunk costs, so they don't matter. At least according to the logic you were using for Saddams torture chambers.
I didn't say that we invaded Iraq for the torture chambers, so don't put words in my mouth. Maybe those weren't mass graves after all, just a game of underground hide and seek gone bad. Seriously dude, I really hope you don't believe everthing your saying.
Sunk costs deal with economics, not human lives. As I said before costs are still incurred after people die. How about the cost of having your working husband die? Lost wages continue to add up years after thier death. Or the oppurtunity cost of not being able to take care of your children because you have to work due to a death? Your sunk cost analogy is horrific, as is most of your logic(although your spelling tops both of them). On a side note, I would like to thank you for not going over the basics of economic theory, my B.A. in Economics covered it. Maybe you should just stick to DKOS where anything anti Bush flies without a hint of skepticism, that is a great place for a person as intellectually dishonest as yourself.

 
At 4/25/2005 6:03 PM, Blogger iraqwarwrong said...

OMG its amazing how with a little bit of the truth comes out. 100,0000 civilians KILLED BY UNTIED STATES and (AND I QUOTE) "they don't matter" says you! No wonder The World hates us! I didn't expect such a revelling admission so soon from a dhinger with no effort but this genocidal feeling's must be pretty close to surface eh?

Then u bring up the mass grave's which is stupid because thats just part of the sunk costs (again) why is that so hard 4 u? But talk about hipocritical. So its ok for US (superior whites/West is that it?) to kill 1000,00 Iraqi's but not ok for Saddam an ACTUAL ARAB MUSLIM to do the same thing (or a little bit less)? Nice logic there.

Yes sunk costs deal with economic's More spacficialy its is consept borrowed FROM economic's theory for Analogy. (Heard of Analogies?). If u RELLY have B.S. in Economic's (which I doubt) u would know that. The POINT (if u can follow) is that if u want to be Reality Based this is how you have to do it instead of flinging emotionalism's about "mass graves rape rooms bla bla" around all the time. Thats not how thinking people do it.

U can diss Kos all you want (with NO basis, I might add). But you can't avoid the truth just by dissing one(1) blog. Check MarkAR Keliman or matthew Yglesias or ANYONE really in the Reality Base Community they'll say the same. Gees.

 
At 4/25/2005 6:29 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Forget it, your a moron. You obviously cannot read, or write English. I thought it was just a spelling problem and you would be able to have some kind of conversation, but apparently it is affecting your brain as well. Whatever reality based is I must have missed it when reading through my Clifford the Big Red Dog books as a child. My only point was that if the people who were killed in Saddam's death chambers are sunk costs, then so are the civilians killed by the U.S. I do not believe that either group is a sunk costs, but apparently you cannot comprehend this. How is one group a sunk cost and the other one not according to your logic? Since Saddam was a good guy he can kill people, and it will just be a sunk cost, right? Im done with your inconsistent application of sunken costs. Good luck finishing middle school.
Just in case you missed it I DO NOT THINK ANY DEATH IS A SUNK COST.

 
At 4/25/2005 8:38 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Damn, all that garbage about sunken costs for nothing. I feel stupid for wasting my time. I didn't think anyone could be that dumb, but I have seen some really idiotic posts at DU and KOS. Heh, you got me. Funny stuff, too bad its not real, that would be funnier.

http://www.iftheyonly.nu/jul_dec04.html#031104b

 
At 4/25/2005 9:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

i can't decide whether or not this is a treacher production... if so hes put a little bit mroe effort into it than his other characters...

 
At 4/26/2005 5:53 AM, Anonymous phil hendre said...

Thanks everybody. I'll be here all week.

 
At 4/27/2010 6:03 PM, Blogger qishaya said...

is one of the labels that never become outdated. Designing by ed hardy sale one of the best tattoo artists that ever lived, these clothes will clearly deposit the suffering of time- trend sensible. cheap ed hardy Being able to buy clothes that are considered to be forever in tailor is indeed challenging. ed hardy online shop The key to this feat is actually unadorned. ed hardy swimwear You must forever reminisce that in shape, ed hardy hats it is very important that the designs are well-thought of, ed hardy sunglasses and reflects all types of personalities. ed hardy belts If a consumer relates to the mode, then you can be assured that the individual will always feel at diminish with what he is tiresome. ed hardy mens This is the debate why you should actually christian audigier think about what clothes fit your own form before selling them.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Listed on 
BlogShares Blog Directory & Search engine